Tuesday 27 January 2015

Six Key Elements of Cooperative Learning



Six Key Elements of Cooperative Learning
v  Teams
v  Will to Cooperate
v  Cooperative Management
v  Skill to Cooperate
v  Four Basic Principles
v  Cooperative Structures

Four Basic Principles of Cooperative Learning:
Positive Interdependence
Individual Accountability
Equal Participation
Simultaneous Interaction

Cooperative Structures:
v  Agreement Circles: Students stand in a large circle, then step to the center in proportion to their agreement with a statement by a student or teacher.
v  Blind Sequencing: Students sequence all pieces without peeking at the pieces of teammates.
v  Circle-the –Sage: Students who know, stand to become sages; teammates each gather around a different sage to learn.  Students return to teams to compare notes.


v  Corners: Students pick a corner, write its number, go there, interact with others with same corner choice in a Rally Robin or Timed Pair Share.
v  Fan-N-Pick: Played with higher-level thinking Q cards. #1 fans, #2 picks, #3 answers, #4 praises.  Students then rotate roles.
v  Find My Rule: The teacher places items in a frame (two boxes, Venn, on a line); students induce the role.
Two Box Induction
What’s My Line
Crack My Venn
v  Find Someone Who: Students circulate, finding others who can contribute to their worksheet.
            People Hunt:  Students circulate, finding others who match their own characteristics.
            Fact Bingo:  Find someone who played on bingo worksheet.
v  Find the Fib: Teammates try to determine which of three statements is a fib.         Fact or Fiction:  Teammates try to determine if a statement is true or false.
v  Flashcard Game: Flashcards in pairs, with rounds progressing from many to no clues
v  Formations: Students stand together as a class to form shapes.
v  Four “S” Brainstorming: Sultan of Silly, Synergy Guru, Sergeant Support, and the Speed Captain play their roles as they quickly generate many ideas which are recorded by Synergy Guru.
            Think Pad Brainstorming:  No roles.  Students generate items on think pad slips, announcing them to teammates and placing them in the center of the table.
v  Idea Spinner: Spin Captain “Shares an Idea” or “Quizzes a Pal” to Summarize, Evaluate, Explain, or Predict.

v  Inside/Outside Circle: Students in concentric circles rotate to face a partner to answer the teacher’s questions or those of the partner.
v  Jigsaw Problem Solving: Each teammate has part of the answer or a clue card; teammates must put their info together to solve the team problem.
v  Line Ups: Students line up by characteristics, estimates, values, or assigned items.
            Value Lines:  Students line up as the agree or disagree with a value statement.
            Folded & Split Line Ups:  Students fold the Line Up or Split and Slide it to interact with someone with a different point of view, characteristic, or estimate.
v  Lyrical Lessons: Students write and/or sing songs based on curriculum, often to familiar tunes.
v  Match Mine: Receivers arrange objects to match those of Senders whose objects are hidden by a barrier.
            Draw-What-I-Say:  Receiver draws what sender describes.
            Build-What-I-Write:  Receiver constructs what Sender has described in writing.
v  Mix-Freeze-Group: Students rush to form groups of a specific size, hoping not to land in “lost and found.”
v  Mix-Pair-Discuss: Students pair with classmates to discuss question posed by the teacher.
v  Mix-N-Match: Students mix, then find partners with the matching card.
            Snowball:  Students toss crumpled papers over imaginary volleyball net, stop, pick up a snowball, then find the person with the matching “snowball.”
v  Numbered Heads Together: Students huddle to make sure all can respond, a number is called, the student with that number responds.
            Paired Heads Together:  Students in pairs huddle to make sure they both can respond, an “A” or “B” is called, the student with that letter responds.
v  One Stray: The teacher calls a number; students with that number “stray” to join another team, often to share.
            Two Stray:  Two students stray to another team, often to share and to listen.
            Three stray:  Three students stray to another team, often to listen to the one who stayed to explain a team project.

v  Pairs Check: Students work first in pairs each doing a problem and receiving coaching and praise from their partner; then pairs check and celebrate after every two problems.
v  Pairs Compare:Pairs generate ideas or answers, compare their answers with another pair, and then see if working together they can come up with additional responses neither pair alone had.
v  Paraphrase Passport: Students can share their own ideas only after they accurately paraphrase the person who spoke before them.
v  Partners: Pairs work to prepare a presentation, then present to the other pair in their team.
v  Poems for Two Voices: Partners alternate reading “A” and “B” lines of a poem, and read “AB” lines together in unison.
            Songs for Two Voices:  Partners alternate singing “A” and “B” lines of a song, and sing “AB” lines together in unison.
v  Q-Spinner: Students generate questions from one of 36 prompts produced by spinners.
v  Rally Robin:Students in pairs take turns talking.
            Rally Toss:  Partners toss a ball (paper wad) while doing Rally Robin.
v  Teammates Consult:For each of a series of questions, students place pens in cup, share and discuss their answers, and then pick up pens to write answer in own words.
v  Team Interview: Students are interviewed, each in turn, by their teammates.
v  Team Chants:Teammates come up with words and phrases related to the content, then come up with a rhythmic chant often with snapping, stomping, tapping, and clapping.
v  Similarity Groups:Students form groups based on a commonality.
v  Send-A-Problem:Teammates make problems which are sent around the class for other teams to solve.
v  Same – Different: Students try to discover what’s the same and different in two pictures, but neither student can look at the picture of the other.
v  Rotating Review:Teams discuss topic; chart their thoughts; rotate to the next chart to discuss and chart their thoughts.


Approach,Teachnique, Method



Approach,Teachnique, Method
1.Edward Anthony
-          There are three hierarchical elements – approach, method, technique
Explanation:
Approach = set of assumptions dealing with the nature of language, learning and teaching
Method = an overall plan for systematic presentation of language based upon a selected approach
Techniques = the specific activities manifested in the classroom that are consistent with a method and therefore in harmony with an approach as well
2.Theodor Rogers, Jack Richards
-          Proposed a reformation of the concept of method
Method = their method is more referred to methodology“
            = a generalized set of classroom specifications for accomplishing linguistic objectives.
The subordinate themes are: approach, design, procedures
3.Elements and subelements of method – Richards and Rogers
approach                         design                                 procedure
1. theory of native            1. the general and the            classroom
language                             specific objectives       techniques+procedures
2. a theory of the nature   2. syllabus                            and behaviours
of language learning         3. types of learning and         observed when
                                                    teaching activities                          the method is used
                                                 4. learner´s role
                                                  5. teacher´s role
                                                 6. the role of instrumental
                                               materials
                Definitions that reflect current usage:
Methodology = the study of pedagogical practices in general (how to teach)
Approach = theoretical positions and beliefs about the nature of language, the nature of language learning
Method = a generalized set of classroom specifications for accomplishing linguistic objectives
Syllabus = design for carrying out a particular language program
Technique = any of a wide variety of exercises, activities or devices used in the language classroom for realising lesson objectives.

LANGUAGE PLANNING




                                                                LANGUAGE PLANNING
                Background of language planning
       Sir William Jones that almost all languages root back to one ‘proto’, or ‘parent’ language. The Proto-Indo-European language is an unrecorded language that is believed to be the ancestor of all Indo-European languages.
       6900 spoken world languages, but during the 1990’s only 104 languages were granted official state in the then 195 political states (Daoust 1997:451-2). 
       Nowadays, just over 60% of the World’s population speak one of the top 30 languages as their native tongue (Ethnologue, 2005).
       Einar Haugen (1950’s)à Language Planning refers to “all conscious efforts that aim at changing the linguistic behaviour of a speech community” (Deumert, 2009: 371)
       Language planning can be initiated to push a certain language towards a stipulated goal.
       Language Planning can either encourage or dissuade people from speaking a language.

Theoretical division of language planning
Language Planning – definitions
       According to Haugen (1950s): “all conscious efforts that aim at changing the linguistics behaviour of speech community”
       According to Fishman (1987): "the authoritative allocation of resources to the attainment of language status and corpus goals, whether in connection with new functions that are aspired to, or in connection with old functions that need to be discharged more adequately"
       Dictionary definition (dictionary.com): “ the development of policies and programs designed to direct or change language use, as though the establishment of an official language, the standardisation or modernisation of language, or the development or alternation of writing system.”

Dimensions of language planning:
       Kloss (1967):
Corpus planning - internal structure of language à language standardisation (creation and establishment of a uniform linguistic norm)
Status planning - function of language, allocation of new functions, e.g. official, provincial, international
       Haarmann (1990)
Prestige Planning – “creating a favourable psychological background which is crucial for the long-term success of language planning activities (…)” (Deumert, 2009)
Another new dimension:
Acquisition planning – promotion of language.

The process of language planning:
Haugen (1983)
  1. Selection
  2. Codification
  3. Implementation
  4. Elaboration/ Modernisation

                                                            References
       Benton, R A (1981). Schools as agents for language revival in Ireland and New Zealand In: B Spolsky ed. 1986. Language and Education in Multilingual Settings, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
       Coluzzi, P (2007) Minority Language Planning and Micronationalism in Italy, 2007, Switzerland: International Academic Publishers
       Cooper (1989) Language Planning and Social Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
       Daoust, D. (1997), ‘Language planning and language reform’, in F.Coulmas (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 436-532
       Darquennes, J. (2007) Paths to Language Revitalization, Contact Linguistics and Language, Volume 30. Pgs 61-76
       Deumert, A., (2009), Language Planning and Policy in R.Mesthire, J.Swann, A.Deumert, W.L.Leap eds. (2009), Introducing Sociolinguistics (2nd edition), Edinburgh University Press